Thursday, March 27, 2025
Josh Cable
In gambling, the “house edge” is a casino's statistical advantage over all participants. This built‑in edge ensures that the casino always makes a profit, even if a few lucky winners walk away with a windfall.
But the secret to the casino’s success isn’t just the math. The house keeps players engaged and pouring money into the system – sometimes long after they should’ve cashed out – by maintaining the illusion of fair play and dangling the promise of potential fortune.
As Investopedia puts it: “The casino isn’t aiming to bankrupt a player in one sitting. The goal is to give the player hope, keep them coming back, and over the long run gradually empty their pockets.”
Much like a casino, SaaS pricing is designed to keep businesses playing (and paying) while making it difficult to walk away.
SaaS pricing models are carefully constructed to entice businesses with the promises of simplicity, flexibility, and cost savings – while subtly tilting the odds in the provider’s favor.
Hidden fees, usage‑based traps, and gamified user interfaces are a few of the tactics that “Dumb SaaS” providers employ to maximize their profits and ensure that the house always wins.
In this blog post, we’ll break down the most common SaaS pricing models, expose the hidden costs that providers don’t want you to see, and show you how to stack the odds in your favor.
In much the same way that casinos cater to players with widely varying risk appetites and spending power, SaaS pricing models are designed to appeal to businesses of all sizes and budgets. Whether you’re looking for predictable flat‑rate pricing, a flexible pay‑as‑you‑go structure, or a “free” product with optional upgrades, it seems like there’s something for every organization.
For Dumb SaaS providers, the goal is to maintain the illusion that customers are in control. But don’t be fooled: Regardless of the pricing model, the house always has an edge.
Many traditional SaaS providers have rigged the game with surprise fees, data‑migration restrictions, and other machinations that maximize their profits – while keeping businesses trapped in their cash machine.
And just like in a casino, the longer you’re stuck in their ecosystem, the more you pay.
“A player may be ahead in the short term,” Investopedia says of the house edge in gambling. “However, over the long haul, the house edge eventually will grind them down into unprofitability.”
Let’s explore the most common SaaS pricing models – and where Dumb SaaS vendors maintain their house edge in each of them.
With flat‑rate SaaS pricing, businesses pay a monthly or annual fixed price for all‑inclusive access to the software.
Pros:
Simple, predictable costs that make budgeting easier
No need to track users, features, or consumption limits
House Edge: One Size Fits None
With flat‑rate bundles, you could be paying for features you never use or can’t customize to your business needs.
Usage thresholds could trigger upcharges (or could be the platform’s actual limitations).
If your business outgrows the plan, you might need to upgrade to an enterprise package.
Tiered pricing offers multiple pricing levels, with each higher tier providing additional features, users, or storage at an increased cost.
Pros:
Businesses can choose a plan that fits their needs.
Lower‑cost tiers provide an accessible entry point for small businesses and startups.
House Edge: Upsell Hell
Providers encase essential features in higher‑tier plans, forcing upgrades.
Head‑scratching tier structures make it hard to compare plans, leading to “FOMO” overspending.
Gamified UIs tantalize customers with advanced functionality that can only be activated by upgrading to a more expensive tier.
Exceeding usage caps can trigger automatic bumps to higher tiers.
With usage‑based pricing, businesses pay only for what they use – measured in compute power, data storage, API calls, or other metrics.
Pros:
Can be cost‑effective if usage is low or highly variable
No need to overpay for unused capacity
House Edge: The Bottomless Pit
Without a fixed price, budgeting becomes a gamble – and sudden usage spikes can lead to wild billing swings.
Some providers ratchet up per‑unit costs as usage grows, turning scalability into a hidden premium.
Many services scale usage automatically, making it easy to rack up a bill that takes your breath away.
With freemium SaaS pricing, business customers get free access to a stripped‑down version of the software. As with tiered pricing, premium features are maddeningly out of reach – visible but locked behind paywalls.
Pros:
Businesses can take a try‑before‑you‑buy approach to testing the platform.
House Edge: The Digital Cover Charge
With critical features paywalled, you’ll quickly run into limitations that pressure you to upgrade.
Some SaaS vendors intentionally restrict data exports to make it difficult for customers to migrate to competing platforms.
Aggressive in‑app/email marketing and relentless pay‑to‑play prompts can distract users and drive FOMO upgrades.
In per‑user SaaS pricing (also known as pay‑per‑seat pricing), businesses pay a set fee per active user.
Pros:
Costs are tied to team size, making budgeting more straightforward.
Works well for collaboration tools and CRM software
House Edge: The Scaling Tax
Costs can escalate quickly when teams expand, punishing growth.
Many vendors won’t let you remove unused seats, so you’re paying for inactive users.
Some plans charge for every registered user – even those who only log in once a month.
With per‑feature pricing, businesses pay for specific features rather than an all‑inclusive plan. Customers can pick and choose features à la carte or within predefined tiers.
Pros:
Businesses only pay for the functionality they need.
Companies can start with a basic plan and add features as their needs grow.
House Edge: The Upgrade Treadmill
Essential tools such as reporting, automation, or integrations are paywalled.
Strategic bundling pressures customers to upgrade for access to just one critical feature.
Costs can spiral as businesses realize they need multiple paid features to use the software effectively.
What looks like a build‑your‑own software model quickly becomes a jigsaw puzzle of pricey add‑ons.
Token‑based pricing is an emerging model that’s gaining traction in AI‑driven SaaS tools. Token‑based pricing works like a modern arcade: Businesses purchase a set number of tokens upfront, and each interaction with the software deducts a certain number of tokens from the balance.
Pros:
Businesses can control and adjust their spending based on actual usage.
House Edge: Playing with ‘Funny Money’
Tokens abstract pricing, complicating efforts to track spending.
AI tools consume tokens fast, leading to hair‑raising overages.
Vendors quietly raise token costs over time, leading to shrinkflation.
Even when businesses choose the pricing model that seems best‑suited to their needs, hidden costs have a way of creeping in. Here’s how Dumb SaaS vendors stack the deck with unexpected costs – no matter which pricing model you choose:
The longer you stay, the more you pay.
Dumb SaaS vendors try to seduce businesses with competitive introductory pricing, only to increase rates annually without adding any discernible value. According to the most recent SaaS Inflation Index from Vertice, a whopping 73% of SaaS vendors hiked their prices in 2023, and 55% raised their prices in 2024.
Red Flags:
Renewal terms embedded in the fine print
Automatic upgrades when usage limits are exceeded
Elimination of “legacy plans,” forcing customers into higher‑cost tiers
Pro Tip: When a SaaS vendor imposes an annual price increase, it’s a great opportunity to reevaluate your relationship with the vendor. Is the software still meeting the needs of your business? As prices go up, has the SaaS provider added functionality or improved the platform in any way?
“You can check out anytime you like, but you can never leave.”
Dumb SaaS providers are obsessed with reducing customer churn – but not by delivering more value. Instead, they’re laser‑focused on making it painful to leave.
Some of the ways that traditional SaaS providers try to limit their customers’ freedom include:
Pro Tip: Before committing to a SaaS provider, ask the vendor about their data‑export process, cancellation terms, and integration policies. Can you easily export your data in a usable format? Are there excessive fees for early termination? If a vendor makes it cumbersome to leave, it’s a red flag that they’re prioritizing retention over customer satisfaction.
Click here to pay more!
Casinos employ persuasive‑design techniques such as flashing lights, suggestive sounds, and intermittent rewards to keep players engaged, hopeful, and pumping money into the system. Similarly, many traditional SaaS vendors gamify the user experience to subtly (or not‑so‑subtly) nudge customers toward more expensive tiers.
Watch out for these and other tricks from the Dumb SaaS playbook:
Pro Tip: Test the software thoroughly before committing. Are all the features your business needs included in the plan you’re considering? Be especially wary of marketing‑heavy dashboards designed to upsell you at every turn instead of optimizing the user experience.
When the honeymoon is over, the real costs kick in.
Free trials and introductory rates can provide a low‑risk opportunity to test‑drive a SaaS platform before committing. But keep in mind that these discounted offers aren’t acts of generosity.
Just as a casino “comps” patrons with free drinks and hotel rooms to encourage vigorous spending, Dumb SaaS providers leverage limited‑time offers to get businesses hooked – only to change the terms once they’re locked in.
Watch out for these common bait‑and‑switch tactics:
Pro Tip: Before signing up for a free trial or introductory offer, read the fine print. What happens when the trial ends? Will you automatically be enrolled in a paid plan? Are all the features you’re testing available in the lower‑tier plans? Make sure the software you’re evaluating is realistically affordable long‑term – not just during the “house special.”
In gambling, the house edge ensures that the casino always comes out on top. But in software as a service, a provider’s profitability shouldn’t come at the expense of your organization’s success.
The Smart SaaS™ movement establishes an entirely new playbook for B2B software delivery, starting with transparent, customer‑first pricing models that align with your business needs – instead of exploiting them.
Here are a few of the areas where Smart SaaS™ flips the odds in your favor:
With Smart SaaS™, you don’t have to ante up for predatory pricing schemes. Explore our free library of SaaS resources and get the insights you need to find a pricing model that truly works for your business.
Stop gambling with your software investments and start making smarter software decisions TODAY!
Navigating SaaS pricing models can be a daunting task for businesses seeking an affordable and effective software solution. Many traditional SaaS providers use psychological pricing tactics, hidden fees, and restrictive contracts to maximize their profits at the expense of customers. In this FAQ, we tackle the most common questions around SaaS pricing models and explain how Smart SaaS™ helps businesses avoid costly SaaS traps.
SaaS pricing refers to the different models software‑as‑a‑service providers use to charge customers for access to their platforms. Instead of making a one‑time purchase, businesses pay a recurring fee (monthly, annually, or based on usage). Pricing structures vary, from simple flat rates to complex models that adjust based on users, features, or consumption levels.
Typically, SaaS pricing is subscription‑based, meaning businesses pay for continued access rather than owning the software outright. Depending on the model, SaaS pricing may be fixed (flat‑rate), scaled (tiered), or variable (usage‑based). Many traditional SaaS providers use tactics such as overage fees, forced upgrades, and data‑export restrictions to maximize their revenue.
Usage‑based pricing is attractive to SaaS vendors because it scales revenue with customer activity, ensuring steady growth as usage increases. While businesses may perceive it as fair – paying only for what they use – unpredictable consumption patterns can lead to cost volatility. Token‑based pricing is an emerging model that’s gaining traction in AI‑driven SaaS tools.
Flat‑rate pricing charges a fixed monthly or annual fee for full access to the software, while tiered pricing offers multiple plans with increasing features, users, or storage at higher costs. Both models can lead to overpaying for unused features, as businesses may be forced into plans that include tools they don’t need.
To find the best SaaS pricing model, start by evaluating your business needs. How many users will access the software? Will usage fluctuate? What features are essential for your operations? Choose a model that scales without artificial restrictions or hidden fees. Smart SaaS™ providers offer transparent, flexible pricing that supports your business growth – without the fine‑print traps.
